Who holds control
- main
- deploy
- datos
Whoever decides. They mark what is critical and what is automated. Control always stays with that person.
AI governance
Your company's AI, under your control.
Governance is the framework that keeps it from getting away from you. Your team prompts, your vendors do too. And your agents make changes on their own. What is critical and relevant goes through you, and stays checked. The rest is automated. Everything is traced. Control always stays with you.
What is critical gets reviewed. The rest keeps going.
Whoever decides marks what is relevant. That goes through a person, aligned with the project and the company. The rest is automated, and control stays with them.
What is critical
- CI✓
- Standards✓
- Review✓
A person reviews it before it ships, aligned with the standards of the project and the company.
The rest
build → deploy●
PR #128 · auto
It is automated. It keeps going on its own, inside the rules that person set.
The platform
This is what Governance looks like inside.
The board where every change waits for its review: who asked, who did it, who looks, and where it stands. Explore it all: approve the first change, check the projects, connect an AI, and open your account.
governance.wup.ar
Checkout · pricing update
- Asked
- Product
- Operated
- Cursor
- Looked
- Tech lead
- Branch
- feat/checkout-pricing
- Commit
- a3f9c1e · main
How it works
What is critical is checked. The rest is automated. Everything is traced. Control stays with whoever decides.
1
The work comes in
A collaborator using AI, or an agent acting on its own. Cursor, Claude, or Slack. The request is written down.
2
A person reviews what is relevant
They check it against the standards of the project and the company. What is not relevant is automated, inside those rules.
3
Everything is traced
Who did it, what changed, whether a person reviewed it or it went on its own, and the commit. The trail can be shown.
The check
GitHub lets the code through. Whoever decides controls what is critical.
Locking the branch is not enough. A person checks what is relevant. The rest can keep going on its own. If something reached production outside that, it stays in view of whoever decides.
What is critical ships after review
If the main branch is locked, what is relevant ships when that person approved it. The rest can stay automated. If the branch cannot be locked, what landed and who let it through is still on record.
The change stays traced
What was checked, what was automated, who allowed it, and which commit. The trail stays. Control belongs to whoever decides.
The AI they already use
It comes in through chat. Control stays with whoever decides.
Cursor, Claude, Slack, and whatever comes next. What is critical does not ship without review. The rest keeps going, inside their rules.
Claude
Cursor
OpenAI
Grok
Gemini
Copilot
Perplexity
Windsurf
Slack
GitHub
Whatever comes next, if it can hit an API, it is in.
The AI keeps working. Control stays with whoever decides.
What is critical stays checked. The rest is automated. Everything is traced. Control is not let go.
If you do not have access yet, talk to WakeUp Labs.